Role shape.
Behavioral demandsSee what it really takes to win in this role, before you post it.
You already measure skill. Korture measures will. A 7-minute scan shows what drives each candidate, and how to shape the role so they outperform.
Create your role's brief & scan 10 candidates for free.
Built on 70+ years of behavioral science.
Reading the role
Reading the real work of the role
01 / 06Paste the role you're hiring for. Korture reads its own words, never a template.
See what it really takes to win in this role, before you post it.
See who keeps delivering, not just who can do the job.
Strong on keeping things aligned, lighter on winning people over, the demand that decides it.
Stop rewarding the best talker, score what actually decides the role.
Structured behavioral interviews pick the right person better than gut feel.
Operational validity for predicting job performance, structured vs unstructured interview. Sackett, Zhang, Berry, Lievens (2022). Journal of Applied Psychology.
Layer the energy fit on the structured interview, and you stack the odds your hire is a top performer, not just someone who can do the job.
Interest fit predicts job performance and persistence, and adds validity on top of ability and the structured interview. Nye et al. (2012); Van Iddekinge et al. (2011).
Most teams settle for one, or neither. Korture builds the structured interview and reads where a candidate's energy lands, on every role you open.
No black box. Every role map and every candidate result shows its reasoning in plain English. Korture is the translation layer between 70+ years of behavioral science and the hiring stack you already run.
AI smoothed every CV into the same shape. What energizes a person is the only signal left that separates one strong candidate from another.
A thirty-minute gut-feel conversation reads chemistry, not whether someone is wired for the work. You walk out with a hunch, not evidence.
Korture brings 70+ years of behavioral science to every role you open, then plugs straight into the tools you already use. Expert-grade reads, without the expert bottleneck.
One wrong hire costs months. Getting the energy right up front is the difference between a fast climb and a long, uphill push.
Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, or any ATS with an API. We add the behavioral layer, we don't replace your stack.
Map it once per role, then plug it into the hiring tools you already run.
Or describe the role from scratch. Korture maps both into the nine behavioral demands.
The shape of your role and the few make-or-break demands that decide this hire. Thirty seconds.
Candidates take seven minutes. Forced-choice. No right answers, no test anxiety.
See where each candidate's energy lands on the role, demand by demand. Plus a gap probe written for the biggest watch-out on this candidate.
Energy, not skill. It is a behavioral read of where someone leans in and where they push uphill against the demands of your role.
Skill you test in the interview. The scan tells you who will keep doing the hard parts once the new-job glow fades.
AI writes plausible questions from the words in your JD. It cannot tell you whether the person across from you is wired for the role. Korture reads the candidate’s energy against the role’s make-or-break demands, on the same behavioral backbone it used to build the brief, with BARS-anchored rubrics from real I-O psychology. AI guesses. Korture reads what energizes someone.
No. Seven minutes of which sounds more like you. No resume, no prep. It reads how someone is wired, not where they have worked.
Most likely yes. Any ATS with an API, including Greenhouse, Lever, and Ashby. We add the behavioral layer, we do not replace your stack.
Free to start, then $4 per scan. Map a role and read a candidate before you decide.
No. Low energy on a demand is a heads-up, not a red flag. It points you to the exact question to ask, so you can hear how they handle the part of the job that runs against their grain.
First role free, then $4 per scan. Plugs into Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, or any ATS with an API. Built on 70+ years of behavioral science.