Stays.Performs.Grows.
Most bad hires passed your culture round.
See behavioral fit before the offer. Every score traces back to a phrase in your JD, so you know how someone will actually work, not just what they know.
513 scans completed. 94% finish rate.
Every shortlist looks identical.
So most teams settle it in a 30-minute culture round. Gut feel. No evidence.
74% of employers admit hiring the wrong person.
CareerBuilder, Harris Poll
The Problem
What the culture round cannot catch consistently.
Drains.Disengages.Leaves.
How we catch it consistently
AI maps culture to behavioral fit, grounded in decades of research.
Principle 01
Job tasks mapped
We know what every role actually demands.
Principle 02
Of behavioral science
Fit is about the role and culture.
Principle 03
Validated profiles
Grounded in real people, not theory.
The stakes
of first-year earnings lost to a misaligned hire.
Source: US Dept of Labor
The validity
better at predicting job performance.
Source: Sackett et al., 2022
Consistent behavioral fit, in four steps.
Paste JD
AI reading for behavioral signals
Company context
Same title, different company = different brief
Sharpening questions
This role is mostly...
The pace is...
These two answers shift the brief more than most JD paragraphs
Your brief appears
Setting your own direction
5/5Navigating without a clear plan
4/5Deciding before all the data is in
5/5Convincing people who don't report to you
4/5Rapid focus shifts
3/5
5 dimensions, tailored to this role
Mapped to this role. Built in 2 minutes.
We're looking for a Product Lead who can own the roadmap end-to-end, drive cross-functional alignment across engineering, design, and data, and be comfortable with ambiguity as we scale from seed to Series B.
occupations studied
behavioral profiles
"Strong communicator" means different things at a 5-person startup vs. a 500-person enterprise
The same JD phrase maps to different dimensions depending on company stage and role scope
AI cross-checks your JD against behavioral research, not just keyword matching
Deciding before all the data is in
People who get energy from this move fast from research to action, even with gaps
Every score traces to a phrase in your JD.
Selected for this role
Setting your own direction
Less alignment with team direction
Navigating without a clear plan
Can miss details by moving too fast
Deciding before all the data is in
Bias toward speed means less time validating
Convincing people who don't report to you
Energy spent persuading, not executing
Rapid focus shifts
Less depth on any single task
Not required for this role
Long stretches of solo focus
May miss collaborative opportunities
Navigating competing demands from different people
Decision fatigue from constant prioritization
Finding new ways when the obvious path is blocked
May over-complicate simple problems
Following the system, every time
Slower adaptation when rules change
Working within rules that slow things down
Frustration when exceptions are needed
Carrying other people's growth
Less time for your own technical work
Being 'on' for people outside the company
Social energy drain over time
Staying hands-on while doing everything else
Harder to delegate as scope grows
Thinking long-term while putting out fires
Pulled between strategy and tactics
Walking into disagreements instead of around them
Can create friction even when right
5 of 15 dimensions active
Fit is rare. That's why spotting it matters.
Screen 0+ people against this brief. Here's what you'd find:
Why this is hard to hire for
"Setting your own direction" and "Being 'on' for people outside the company" rarely coexist. These energy patterns pull in opposite directions.
A 7-minute scan. No right answers.
This is a quick way to understand how you naturally prefer to work.
No trick questions, no right or wrong answers.
The rare ones, ranked.
Top tier first.
Product Leader
28 candidates assessed, ranked by behavioral fit.
- 0189
Michael Brown
Finding new ways when blockedBeing 'on' for external people - 0286
Jennifer Parker
Deciding before all data is inBeing 'on' for external people - 0382
Daniel Cooper
Finding new ways when blockedBeing 'on' for external people - 0481
Rachel Adams
Being 'on' for external peopleFinding new ways when blocked
Why Michael Brown fits. Questions ready for the room.
Priya S.
7-minute scan, no right answers
Pick A or B. Neither is right or wrong. Measures what gives you energy, not what you know.
Strongest
Setting your own direction. Priya prefers figuring things out over being told what to do.
Watch out
Rapid focus shifts. This role needs constant context-switching. Priya pulls toward sustained focus. Worth exploring.
Interview question
Tell me about a time you had to juggle multiple urgent priorities in a single day. What did you do first, and what did you let wait?
Four reasons you might hesitate. Answered.
Candidates will hate it
7 minutes. 94% finish.
No prep. No right answers. Candidates get a free career brief back whether or not they get the role.
It won't fit our process
Native to your stack.
Runs before your first call. Augments every round after. Native to Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, or via API.
What about bias
Every score traces to your JD.
Role-specific. Forced-choice. Validated across 40+ countries and 70 years of behavioral science.
Our pipeline is too small
Know on day one.
Korture tells you if your brief is findable. If only 1 in 20 people match, you know now, not after three months.
None of this replaces your interviews. It gives them evidence.
Your first role is free.
Brief in 2 minutes. Scan in 7 minutes. Results before the first call. No credit card.